King of Whales!

I read a post on Hidden LA (totally recommend that site and their Facebook page, btw) about how Blue Whales have been spotted off the coast of Long Beach and desperately wanted to check for myself. I took Mr. Insom whale watching last year at the end of the California Grey Whale migration and we didn't see a damn thing other than some sea lions perched on a buoy. It was a big fat fail. However, we were on a nice boat with only three other people and we enjoyed being out on the water for a couple of hours, so still was pretty nice. (I'd link that tour, but I can't for the life of me remember what it was.)

But I really wanted to see some whales (and if I was lucky, even some dolphins) and the thought of seeing a blue whale was so tantalizing that I was willing to wake up at 8am on a Saturday to do it.

The outfit I chose to get me to the blues was the Blue Whale and Sea Life Cruise at the Long Beach Aquarium. Leaving every day at 11:30 and 3:00, the cruise is 3.5 hours long and gives you views of the harbor, the Queen Mary, and more oil derricks than you can possibly imagine.

The boat is comfy enough - we were sailing on the Christopher. There are bench style seats in the back of the boat and padded seats in the front.

There's a counter for snacks - popcorn, candy, and even beer. lol

You're free to walk around the boat at all times and stand near the railings if you prefer.

In my opinion the best seats are where I was sitting - up at the top of the padded seats in the front, preferably on the side. Like see this woman with the major hardware whose hobby is photographing whales and birds? You want to sit where she is.

Camera lens envy. :( lol

Shots of leaving the harbor. When we started at 11:30am, there was a light marine layer and the skies were gray, but it quickly burned off and we had blue skies for most of the trip. The sea was smooth and calm.

Beautiful island for vacations?

Nope - it's one of the THUMS oil islands disguised to blend in to the surroundings. These are manmade islands that were once owned by several oil companies, but are now under the umbrella of Oxy. They tap into the massive Wilmington Oil Field below most of Ocean Boulevard, downtown Long Beach and the port.

[blog detour: I've become rather interested in the history of and contemporary oil production in the Los Angeles area. I mean, I grew up next to an oil field and currently live blocks away from an oil derrick. I find the coexistence of these things with LA's urbanity so interesting and somewhat sobering. After some research, I'd love to do a blog post on this. Anyway, back to whales!]


The blue whale is the largest mammal and possibly the largest animal period to ever inhabit the earth. How big you ask? Time for some blue whale fun facts!

• Blue whales can grow up to 100 feet (~30 m). Lengthwise that's the equivalent of two city buses and longer than an NBA basketball court.
• They can weigh up to 200 tons. That's about 8 DC-9 aircrafts or 15 school buses.
• In fact, their tongue alone weigh as much as an elephant. About 100 people can fit in a blue whale's mouth.
• A blue whale heart is the size of a Mini Cooper and can weigh close to 2,000 pounds (~907 kg). Its heartbeat can be detected from two miles away and a human can easily crawl through its major arteries.
• Blue whales can produce sounds louder than a jet engine (188 dB vs. jet engine's 140 dB) and can communicate with other whales up to 1,000 miles away.
• A single adult eats about 4 tons of krill (tiny shrimplike animals) a day.
• The spray from a blue whale's blowhole is almost as tall as a three-story building (30 feet or 9 m). A toddler can fit into its blowhole.

Wait, is there something on the horizon?

Thar she blows! It's the Balaenoptera musculus!

The blue whale is blue-gray in color, but often with lighter gray mottling on a darker background. So beautiful.

Its dorsal (top) fin is small and triangular or falcate (curved) in shape, and is located three-fourths of the way back on the body.

As baleen whales, blue whales eat krill, little shrimp like creatures, by straining them through series of 260-400 fringed overlapping plates hanging from each side of the upper jaw.




We got to see a piece of the baleen (along with a sea lion skull).

In the summer, the blue whales are eating 4 tons of this stuff or more each day. This means it may eat up to 40 million krill. The krill are pink, so guess what color the blue whale poo is?

Yep.

Maybe if you eat this, you'll have pink poo too.



They are fast, strong swimmers, capable of reaching 30 mph (48.3 km/hr) when alarmed, but they usually cruise along at about 12 mph (19.3 km/hr).


The flukes are broad and triangular. The rear edge is smooth with a slight median notch.

Blue whales often travel in pairs and we spent most of the time following a pair (perhaps a mother and offspring).

Look at that spout!

They would do deep dives and raise their impressive flukes and then rest for a bit by swimming just under the surface and coming up for frequent breaths.

Because of their enormous size and speed, blue whales were safe from early whalers, who could not pursue them in open boats with hand harpoons. But in 1868 a Norwegian, Sven Foyn, revolutionized the whaling industry with the invention of the exploding harpoon gun and by using steam and diesel powered factory ships and catcher boats. He also perfected the technique of inflating dead whales with air so they wouldn't sink after being harpooned. The whaling industry began to focus on blue whales after 1900. A single 90-foot blue whale could yield up to 120 barrels of oil, and the blues were killed by the thousands.

When blue whales surface, the ocean changes color slightly - it goes from a deep blue to sort of a greenish color just before they surface. Good for us whale watchers, but bad for the blues when they were being hunted. All hunters had to do was aim and the telltale spot and fire.

The slaughter peaked in 1931 when over 29,000 were killed in one season. After that blue whales became so scarce that the whalers turned to other species and, belatedly, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) banned all hunting of blue whales in 1966 and gave them worldwide protection. Recovery has been extremely slow, and only in the last few years have there been signs that their numbers may be increasing. Pre-whaling population estimates were over 350,000 blue whales, but up to 99% of blue whales were killed during whaling efforts. Presently, there are an estimated 5-10,000 blue whales in the Southern Hemisphere, and only around 3-4,000 in the Northern Hemisphere.

That's kind of a downer, I know... but it definitely made me more conscious about the things that I personally can do to make the ocean a better place for marine life. Chantal our guide mentioned the pacific garbage patch and how bits of ground up plastic are now replacing seashells on our beaches. I'm definitely more committed to decreasing waste now.

In addition to blue whales, we also saw some fin whales. The fin whale is the second largest whale and is characterized by a prominent dorsal fin.

It's one of the fastest whales and is capable of bursts of speed of up to 23 mph (37 km/hr) leading to its description as the "greyhound of the sea." Once blue whales were off limits, people began hunting these as replacements, so now they're on the endangered species list too and are just a fraction of their original numbers.

We stopped following the whales and headed to the rigs in deeper water to see some Californian Sea Lions.

They like to hang out on this buoy.

I felt bad though, because they got annoyed by our presence and jumped off into the water. Our guide Chantal said they they jump on the buoy and it must be a real pain in the ass to get on that thing.

I got even more unnerved when I saw what we were heading to.

Call me naive or uninformed, but I didn't even know these things were even out here. In light of recent events, I'm praying that they take every possible safety precaution they can.

At any rate, they seem like a cheery bunch.

And like some people have mentioned, these oil rigs can be a safe haven for fish and other marine life. Until something goes horribly wrong, I guess.

Sure enough, the sea lions appeared to be having a fine old time on the platforms.

Uh oh - SHARK!

Just kidding! As we were heading back, we ran into a school of bottlenose dolphins in the harbor. They swam alongside the boat, to the delight of many. They are quick and a bitch to capture with a camera.

We also saw some common dolphins. These weren't as big and were even a bigger bitch to capture with a camera.

I don't know what would be worse - to have a name that insults your physical appearance or one that insults your self esteem. Poor dolphins. But at least they're not on the endangered species list...

Looking through my pictures, I realized that I should have taken some video, as the static image doesn't quite give you the same sense of awe at being in the presence of one of the most magnificent creatures on this earth. I found some on youtube though.

If you live anywhere within a couple hours of Long Beach and you don't get seasick, you really should take a few hours and do this. Time is of the essence! Peak blue whale times are July and August. Mr. Insom was out of town, so he couldn't go with me and I liked it so much I'm thinking of going again so I can take him as well.

Prop 8 Report: Parents Just Don't Understand

As you might remember, I was pretty involved in the No on 8 campaign, both before the 2008 election and afterward (see ranting blog posts around Nov 2008). I was devastated when it passed and wanted to know what the hell happened and how I could prevent another injustice from taking place.

Last night I attended a briefing on the Prop 8 report. Written by Dave Fleisher, the report is an independent examination of the No on 8/Yes on 8 campaign. Interviews from thirty decision makers/consultants on the No on 8 campaign along with real-time polling and media reveal very interesting insights.

Dave presenting his work...

Why is this still important?

• The No on 8 campaign was the biggest effort to fight an anti-gay measure to date.
  
• The No on 8 campaign raised more than $43 million, setting a new, higher standard for what the LGBT community and its allies can accomplish in the face of anti-LGBT attacks.
• It is important to learn from our mistakes. Our track record on anti-gay measures isn't too good. 1 win (which was reversed two years later) and 34 losses. It makes perfect sense for the opposition to use the exact same strategy which is why we need to be prepared for the next battle.
  

Here are some of the common perceptions that were bandied about in the aftermath of the election...

Myth: African Americans that came out in historic numbers to support Obama were responsible for the passage of Prop 8.

Fact: We lost among African-Americans and many other groups. But we lost the most ground during the campaign among parents with kids at home, and among key parts of our base, especially white Democrats, Independents, and Greater Bay Area voters. These are groups where we moved backward. Almost three-quarters of the net movement toward the ban was among parents with kids under 18 living at home. Approximately 500,000 of them moved away from us.


Myth: Too much attention was spent on the major cities - not enough resources were devoted to more rural areas like Fresno and the interior of the state.

Although rural areas would have benefited from more support, the parts of the state that most needed additional attention were those already in our base. The geographic area that had the most voters moving away from same-sex marriage was the Greater Bay Area (San Francisco, Marin, Alameda, Contra Costa, Lake, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Sonoma counties). Same-sex marriage lost 31 points in the Greater Bay Area during the campaign - Greater Bay Area voters opposed the ban by 33 points at the beginning, but by only 2 points at the end.

Myth: It was a close race - after all, we lost by only 600,000 votes.

Fact: While we did lose by 600,000 votes (52% to 48%), there was a lot of "wrong way voting." People that were against gay marriage voted No on Prop 8 and vice versa. Because one polling company asked two questions during their polls (i.e., How are you going to vote on Prop 8? Do you support gay marriage?) they were able to measure the extent of wrong way voting. And while both sides had wrong way voting, more people that were opposed to gay marriage had subpar reading comprehension skills (big surprise there). If all voters had correctly understood how to vote to express their opinion on same-sex marriage, Prop 8 would have passed 54% to 46%, by a 1,000,000 vote margin. To reverse the result, we start out 1,000,000 votes behind.

In mid-September both sides were in a dead heat. But between mid-September and election day, approximately 5% of voters—at least 687,000— moved to favor the ban on same-sex marriage. The result was a 10-point swing in favor of the ban.

In the final 6 weeks, the margin between Yes on 8 and No on 8 rose until it peaked on October 22 (happy birthday to me). What made the situation even worse was that absentee ballots started on October 6th and 42% of Californians voted absentee in the 2008 election.

But what accounted for the change? Why did we go from even to being behind?

Remember the Two Princes spot from Yes on 8?

This killed us.

You can actually see the erosion of support for No on Prop 8 (blue line) as the Two Princes ad gains a foothold.



The only ad that managed to stem the hemorrhage and build up support for No on 8 was this ad with Superintendent O'Connell. Around Oct 22 when the O'Connell ad has begun, the blue line begins an upward surge.

Unlike No on 8, the Yes on 8 campaign had a message that was clear and consistent: a pro-gay change is being imposed “whether you like it or not” that poses a real, immediate danger to children.

This chart is hard to see, but it displays the number of Google search results for various Prop 8 messages over time. The search term that was most prevalent was "Prop 8 schools" (blue line) and coincided with the media saturation of the Two Princes campaign. The messages that were indicative of the No on Prop 8 campaign were less prevalent - "Prop 8 Equality" (green), "Prop 8 Discrimination" (red), "Prop 8 Hate" (purple).




This is all that we covered last night, but if you want more information you can check out the report yourself.

Or you can watch this video.



Or if you like, you can come to an in-person briefing on the report by author Dave Fleischer where he'll share data that show why we lost, offer recommendations for how we can do better, and take questions and suggestions from the audience.

Tuesday, August 10th
7:00 - 9:00pm
The Village @ the LA Gay & Lesbian Center
1125 N. McCadden Pl. LA 90038